Change to bzip2?
Jeff Johnson
n3npq at nc.rr.com
Wed Feb 2 16:57:46 UTC 2005
Paul Iadonisi wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 11:20 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
>>And it also makes little sense to bzip tarballs that end up in gzipped
>>payloads imho.
>>
>>
>
> Which begs the question ... why has Red Hat (at least in some cases,
>historically), veered (admittedly only slightly) from the pristine
>source principle by uncompressing gzipped tarballs and recompressing
>them with bzip2 only to stuff them in into an rpm if rpm uses gzip?
>
>
>
Well that's a different qestion.
At the end of a release, there is invariably a fire drill to attempt
to fit on one fewer CD's.
Part of the exercise usually results in tarballs within *.src.rpm's
being recompressed
to save space. Not that it saves much, nor ar *.src.rpm's usually part
of the primary
battle.
Certainly the contents are not changed. All depends on whether you consider
recomprssing a modification to "pristine sources".
73 de Jeff
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list