radical suggestion for fc4 release

[Schlaegel]

seth vidal wrote:

>Which part of the users would this be? The people using fedora in
>'mission critical environments'? I coulda sworn there was something
>about fedora core not be intended for those environments on the front
>page.
>
>Maybe I'm mistaken - but why are we planning and making adjustments for
>folks that the distro is EXPLICITLY not intended for?
>
>-sv
>  
>

I agree. Fedora should follow its purposes. RPM Changelogs are important and
should be supported for supported Fedora, maybe even the most recent 
entry into
Fedora Legacy. Anyone upgrading from an ancient release expects to do a bit
more research than `rpm -qi --changelog package`.

Extremely historic Changelogs are a nuisance that just add noise to the
important information-- what has changed since the last RPM.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050202/396d5979/attachment.htm>