yum bug or repo too borked?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 22:13 +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > Or is it me, some how?
> > 
> > Ok, so repo is borked... I try to update in parts...
> > 
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=147124

Thanks, although I have hit this only with yesterday's build repo.

And I've been curving around bad dependencies manually.

Regards, Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050209/0af408f3/attachment.sig>