Package pruning for FC4 and beyond - question
Eric Warnke
eric at snowmoon.com
Sat Feb 26 18:52:45 UTC 2005
Since this is the second time this has come up...
Is being part of RHEL reason enough to keep things in core? If that is
the case I will exclude from my list all packages that exist in RHEL.
Personally I don't think that should be the goal here.
If you want RHEL compatibility then get a RHEL knockoff.
Cheers
Eric
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:24:18 -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:
>
>
>>Possible without objections
>>mc - Is this really a core util? would it be better served in extras?
>
>
> Considering that it was re-added to RHEL 4, yes.
>
--
Eric Warnke Computer Programmer / Systems Analyst
eric at snowmoon.com 518-727-1523
GPG Fingerprint: E7C5 615B 2115 C9D9 7E75 5088 930B 91E5 218B 6259
'There is always an easy solution to every human problem -- neat,
plausible, and wrong.' - H.L. Mencken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050226/5622228e/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list