Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 11:23 -0800, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:18:41AM +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > I want to run that risk. Exactly what flags do I need to make =y in the
> > i686 kernel config of FC's Linux src.rpm ?
> > 
> > I've tried the obvious one, but the kernel _never_ compiles :|
> 
> I think that compile failure was being caused by the 4g4g patch (at
> least, that used to be the case).
> 
> 2.6.9/10's swsusp is slow and fragile compared to current mainline
> swsusp, so things might work out better if you try with FC4 kernels.

I'm using rawhide.

> I need to get swsusp working on FC3 on my own laptop, so I'll have to
> tackle this problem soon. However, I might not get to it for another
> week or two.

Unless you get the patch and proper Linux versions, it's a hell to try.
Specially with FC's Linux :|

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050121/ebb074c1/attachment.sig>