RFC: Soname in rpm name
Jeff Pitman
symbiont at berlios.de
Tue Jan 25 10:11:25 UTC 2005
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 08:10, Axel Thimm wrote:
> I only see added value at no real cost
Quick reminder: if Bug 130352 isn't addressed, non of the above
discussion is very useful:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/130352
I think the Bug should be re-formulated into an RFE based on Axel's
Provides(noupdate): foo syntax. Or, maybe Provides(virtual):, or
something.
But, this is definitely the first hurdle to jump over, then a more
well-rounded discussion on a method for soname rpms can be more
effective.
take care,
--
-jeff
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list