Nvidia packaging in Fedora (Summary)
Ivan Gyurdiev
ivg2 at cornell.edu
Fri Jan 28 20:46:55 UTC 2005
> > - I still say the libGL devel stuff and libGLU should be split from
> > xorg-x11-devel.
>
> You keep saying that. But, why? There is no other/alternative GL
> implementation in Core or Extras (Nvidia's doesn't/shouldn't count in
> this discussion).
Why do you keep saying that Nvidia's does not count.
What exactly is the problem with their GL headers/library?
> On the other hand, I thought one of Mike's original motivations for
> splitting off Mesa-GL was to allow for drop-in replacements. I'm not sure
> if there is value anymore in packaging these separately.
I heard X will be modularized for FC5 so all libraries will be split up
like that. Is that not the case?
--
Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2 at cornell.edu>
Cornell University
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list