repository creation

[Jeff Johnson]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:

>On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:01:05 -0500, Jeff Johnson <n3npq at nc.rr.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Another split might be attempted by "popularity" as objectively
>>measured by number of downloads. "Popular" or "important" packages might be
>>released more often, while other packages less often, another way to reduce
>>the amount of information that flows from repos.
>>    
>>
>
>That's a pretty talk order.. and would require some particularly well
>communicated and agreed on classifications as to what "important"
>actually means across the spectrum of package maintainers.  Sure we
>could all probably agree that a security update for a package was
>"important"... but i doubt you'd get agreement on the issue of whether
>or not a builddep fix was "important" if the builddep fix was needed
>so that a "popular" dependant package in Extras needed builds in the
>automated buildsystem.
>  
>
Read what I said. The suggested criteria are there.

>You make it sound like core package maintainers are shoving out
>packages on a whim.
>  
>

No I don't, you are bottom trolling.

"Whim" shoving indeed.

73 de Jeff