"vanilla" kernel closest to Fedora kernel
Arjan van de Ven
arjanv at redhat.com
Sun Jan 2 10:23:02 UTC 2005
On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 01:56 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:48 PM -0500 Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > There is not a lot of patching in the Fedora kernel. 2.6.10 will run
> > happily in the FC environment unpatched as the tmpfs selinux patchesare
> > now in
>
> It would be nice if each of the patches in the kernel spec file had a
> comment explaining what it was for and why it was needed. (Pointers to
> bugzillas for each would be adequate.) I've been afraid to use vanilla
> kernels because I didn't know what those patches did and what would break
> if I didn't have them.
there is such a comment for each patch.
I put them at the place where the patch got applied; I'm not sure where
Dave puts them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050102/0a89b9a1/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list