[JPackage-discuss] Re: goals for fc4?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lundi 17 janvier 2005 à 12:11 -0500, Alan Cox a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:30:50PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > bytecode. I don't think there is anyone made the argument than gcj +
> > native is faster than commercial jvm + bytecode.
> 
> Do the benchmarks on a real world test set or for that matter just compare
> the start up time of a proprietary commercial jv eclipse and a compiled one.
> 
> The compiled stuff starts much faster and consumers astronomically less 
> memory and memory bandwidth when running. There are also some nice java
> bindings for Gnome which are useful when you need to run the same core code
> with a different UI on your phone and Linux box.
> 
> I still want an implementation of lcdui for gcj so I can play java phone games
> on my PC but I digress...

I stand corrected;)
I hope the gcj packages in FC4 will prove this to all.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050117/721198c7/attachment.sig>