further package removals/potential package removals

Rui Miguel Seabra rms at 1407.org
Sat Jan 22 12:26:04 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 23:58 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 05:51 +0100, Féliciano Matias wrote:
> > Why do we keep xpdf in Fedora Core ?
> > gpdf works fine.
> 
> gpdf works with a much smaller subset of pdfs than gpdf.
> 
> There's hope, though.  evince[1] will save us all from our crappy widget
> PDF viewing experience.

I've been bought by evince. The speed of it displaying PDFs is
astonishing all by it self. Also, it hasn't had any problem with none of
the PDFs I've got here, and some I had to open with xpdf, other with
gpdf (and a few with ggv).

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050122/65534297/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list