What next?

[seth vidal]

> OK.  I misunderstood your proposal when you chose to quote off of
> Daniel's message about 18 month.  Had you continued from the 9 month
> proposal, I would have continued reading, with interest.  I apologize
> for misinterpreting your intent.

I quoted Daniel's 18 month remark b/c I was feeling pissy and b/c he was
trying to counter my claim of red hat not having anything other than a 6
month release cycle to go on with rhel's release cycle, which I think is
a red herring for the discussion of fedora. I do not advocate an 18month
cycle for fedora, that'd be nuts and would defeat one of the reasons I
like using fedora, which is to know that it will run on recent/newer
hardware. All I'm arguing for is 3 extra months for the time b/t FC4 and
FC5 to give us some time to catch up on some items that need doing.


-sv