What next?

Ronny Buchmann ronny-vlug at vlugnet.org
Thu Jun 2 18:38:10 UTC 2005


On Wednesday 01 June 2005 23:16, seth vidal wrote:
> > > What about stretching out the dev cycle from 3months dev + 3 months of
> > > testing to something more like 6 months of dev + 3 months of testing.
> >
> > agreed in part. Fedora is ready for a bigger cycle so that more
> > fundamental things can get fixed. I don't like 6+3 per se, I'd like 3+3
> > +3, 3 devel, 3 devel+test and 3 test
>
> Sure - but in total a 9 month release cycle for this rev would take the
> strain off of some of us who aren't paid to do this all day.
I think we should do only work on infrastructure for FC5 and basically get 
FC5=FC4+FC4updates+infrastructure in the 6 months timeframe we have.

-- 
http://LinuxWiki.org/RonnyBuchmann




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list