question about RedHat/Fedora and the GPL
Curtis Doty
Curtis at GreenKey.net
Mon Jun 6 17:16:15 UTC 2005
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>yes. All the scripts needed to control the compilation and installation
>of the executable is in the src.rpm perfectly fine.
>
>
I find myself always adding something like:
--- kernel-2.6.spec 2005-05-17 16:50:40.000000000 -0700
+++ kernel-2.6gk.spec 2005-05-30 18:58:15.000000000 -0700
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
%define sublevel 11
%define kversion 2.6.%{sublevel}
%define rpmversion 2.6.%{sublevel}
-%define rhbsys %([ -r /etc/beehive-root -o -n "%{?__beehive_build}" ]
&& echo || echo .`whoami`)
+%define rhbsys %([ -r /etc/beehive-root -o -n "%{?__beehive_build}" ]
&& echo || echo .`whoami`@`hostname -s`)
%if %{FC3}
%define release %(R="$Revision: 1.27 $"; RR="${R##: }"; echo
${RR%%?})_FC3%{rhbsys}
%endif
It sure would be nice if the Red Had specfile maintainers took us into
consideration. .. Those of us who don't have access to the Red Hat IP
known as beehive. .. And have no problem managing our own parallel build
environments.
../C
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list