Intel Pro Wireless cards

[Rodd Clarkson]

On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:03 -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:

> >Just a quick question.  Was there a reason why the ipw2200 drivers
> >weren't updated to 1.0.1, instead of 1.0.0?

> Probably becuase the odd ending number represnets a development driver,
> not stable.  1.0.2 will be the next stable release.

Ah, that's good answer.  All these different version numbering schemes
can get confusing (and I just assumed it was a little like gnome or the
kernel).


Rodd