OO.org2

Caolan McNamara caolanm at redhat.com
Fri Mar 4 19:45:10 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:57 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 23:10 +0000, Paul wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > So, it is in a beta candidate release now. The question is, is it going
> > > to be considered for FC4 or is FC4 going to be 1.1.x?
> > 
> > FC4 has slipped from the schedule slightly, so it the chances are that
> > if OOo2 is released (say) 1st week of April as a release, it stands a
> > good chance of being in.
> > 
> > Of course, I don't work for RH, so could be just speaking out of my
> > backside on that one.
> 
> Caolan has had packages building for quite a while now, and if the damn
> thing doesn't keep failing to build on PPC, it should be out in Rawhide
> by early next week.  Last I heard, the release for OOo 2.0 was going to
> be "April/May", and since FC4 is slated for a June release, chances of
> OOo 2.0 Final being in FC4 a looking good.

After an astonishing 20 hour build 1.9.81 should materialize soon. There
are some known non-specific to fedora bugs so searching the
qa.openoffice.org for your symptoms is likely to explain most problems,
but feel free to log issues for unreported upstream issues against
openoffice.org's fedora bugzilla component.

If gcj/java guys want to poke at the java stuff that builds the
helpcontent2 directory to speed up the slowest build part, that would be
appreciated :-)

C.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list