yum/python/sqlite b0rkage in Rawhide
Kyrre Ness Sjobak
kyrre at solution-forge.net
Mon Mar 14 18:33:08 UTC 2005
man, 14.03.2005 kl. 18.45 skrev Jeff Spaleta:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:25:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt
> <fedora at wir-sind-cool.org> wrote:
> >I don't think so. Just for the record, SQLite 3.1.2 is the first stable
> > version of the v3 series.
>
> yeah even upstreams 3.1.5 release seems to be affected according to to
> some ongoing testing by some people on irc. Appearently there has been
> a change in the allowed sql syntax. Considering that 3.1.x is suppose
> to be backwards compatible with the 3.0.x series, this feels like an
> upstream bug to me. Poking at the upstream bugzilla i see similar
> issues regard some syntax regressions but not the exact problem being
> experienced here. It could be a bug.. or it could be a configurable
> syntax parsing rule issue.
>
> > Interestingly, the sqlite package now upgrades sqlite 2.8.16 from Fedora
> > Extras. This creates a jump from libsqlite.so to libsqlite3.so and
> > breaks ABI and API
>
> Yeah thats a little added wrinkle for sure, consider this a wonderful
> multiversion test case for Fedora Extras packaging guidelines.
>
> -jef"names have been withheld to protect the innocent"spaleta
Then who should provide the sqlite-compat? extras (it won't be compat
for fc3)? base? Or maybe its time to consider naming it sqlite3 and
sqlite2...
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list