Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:28:09AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:25 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > Extras is the entry point to the Fedora Project.  Fedora Project
> > > is the entry point to RHEL.  Why is this so hard to understand?
> > 
> > So this list should be scraped? And GFS will make its reappearance
> > in Fedora Extras?
> 
> Why should this list be scrapped?  Lots of people develop on Fedora
> or for Fedora.

Like myself doing lots of kernel module builds including such for
GFS. So why am I suddenly forced to become an official contributor to
Fedora Extras just to take part to a discussion that is really not
related to Fedora Extras?

> And what does the above have to do w/ GFS?

You removed too much of my reply:

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:25:42PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:18:36AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > For one I fail to see any connection of the issues at hand (GFS kernel
> > > modules) with extras, so forcing people to contribute to extras just
> > > because they want to contribute to FC/RHEL seems to be very wrong.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050317/6388355c/attachment.sig>