Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Thu Mar 17 20:02:45 UTC 2005
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:53:55AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:41 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > This sounds more like fedora-packaging, or would you have a
> > distinctive mark for the differences fedora-packaging vs
> > fedora-maintainers (the former being a normal open list). Yes, there
> > are too many lists at Fedora and making them closed or read-only does
> > not help.
>
> Not exactly. Fedora-packaging was a list space tossed up to
> discuss/create an authoritative packaging guideline for
> Core/Extras/Legacy/etc..
OK, then I guess the discussion should have happened there and not
fedora-maintainers.
> Again, smaller the number of participants w/ stakes the faster
> decisions can be made and implemented. Not all the maintainers are
> interested in such discussion, so why add noise? A lot of
> maintainers just want a guideline to be created, so they can follow
> it. Different topics.
>
> Personally, I like that the lists for Fedora are being clearly
> segregated. This allows me to keep better track of the subjects I
> actually care about by subscribing only to those lists. Big general
> lists mean that I have to sift through tons of email I care not about to
> find (and usually miss) something I DO care about.
>
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050317/a495a782/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list