FC4-Test 1 review

[Brian Pepple]

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 16:53 -0500, Marty Huntzberry wrote:
> I downloaded FC4-Test 1 and installed it ok on an old 450 MHz P3 with 320 MB RAM.  I customized the install to give me KDE only (my pc performance is slower with KDE than other desktops-I'm thinking about reinstalling with GNOME as my desktop instead).  This is on my personal home pc.
> 
> I was frustrated to find that xmms would not stream radio and neither would juk.  I tried to get the needed mp3 plugins using yum and was informed that I needed keys which would not download.  
> 
> Why this mp3 problem?  It's existed since Red Hat and from what I read businesses need (for legal reasons) to buy a mp3 license.  Understandable-but is Fedora Core aimed at the same market as Red Hat?  I thought FC was more of a home computer market while Red Hat is taking on the business market.

Wrong list.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PostIsOffTopic

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050322/66206881/attachment.sig>