Stateless linux

[Matthew Eastman]

Paul A. Houle wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:45:47 +1000, Colin Charles <byte at aeon.com.my> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 07:54 -0700, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I was waiting for some sort of larger announcement and  
>>> mailing list
>>> myself. I had put a very little time into it.. but couldnt see who
>>> else was wanting it or doing anything on it. Having a mailing list
>>> would be useful.
>>
>>
>> It was however decided till the traffic on f-d-l got too high, there
>> would be no stateless linux list. So, why not just use f-d-l in the
>> meantime?
> 
>     Curiosity about stateless linux was one of the reasons I joined 
> f-d-l.   I've heard very little about stateless linux in the last month 
> --  certainly there is another other stuff going on f-d-l that it 
> doesn't seem  like a comfortable place to discuss stateless linux.
> 
>     On the other hand,  it could be that stateless linux is dead in the 
> water  and there wouldn't be enoug of a critical mass to sustain 
> discussion  elsewhere.

I would really like to see the stateless project be revived. It seems 
like it is a good idea, and I know several people, including myself, who 
have implemented alternatives after realizing that stateless was no 
longer being developed. I would be willing to help in this cause if 
there are enough other people for this to worthwhile.

-- 
Matthew Eastman
Center for Computation & Technology
Louisiana State University