no provider for XFree86-devel dependency

Bart Vanbrabant bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be
Thu Nov 3 09:16:11 UTC 2005


Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:12:15PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>   
>> * sam oct 29 2005 Mike A. Harris <mharris at redhat.com> 6.8.2-58
>> - Remove virtual provide "XFree86-devel" backward compatibility.  All
>>   packages that depended on this should now be updated to use the
>> modular
>>   X library virtual provides included in build -56 and later.
>>     
>
> OK.
>
> I guess the workaround is to install with "rpm --nodeps ...".
>
> And sorry, I didn't realize the build reports include the list of broken
> dependencies.
>
> In the last build report:
>
> Broken deps for i386
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 	hplip - 0.9.6-4.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
> 	openhpi - 2.0.3-2.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
> 	pango-devel - 1.10.1-1.i386 requires XFree86-devel >= 0:4.2.99
> 	libsane-hpaio - 0.9.6-4.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
> 	gnome-games - 1:2.12.1-3.i386 requires libhowl.so.0
> 	SDL-devel - 1.2.8-3.2.i386 requires XFree86-devel
> 	OpenIPMI - 1.4.14-10.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
> 	ImageMagick-devel - 6.2.2.0-4.i386 requires XFree86-devel
> 	gtk+-devel - 1:1.2.10-39.i386 requires XFree86-devel
> 	nut - 2.0.2-1.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
> 	gtk2-devel - 2.8.6-3.i386 requires XFree86-devel
> 	imlib-devel - 1:1.9.13-24.i386 requires XFree86-devel
> 	kdeutils - 6:3.4.92-1.i386 requires libnetsnmp.so.5
>
> -- Patrick Mansfield
>
>   
I removed most of the gnome devel packages and yum could cleanly install
the updates. You can't compile new stuff on you're
own now until the deps are ok.

Bart

-- 
Bart Vanbrabant <bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be>
PGP fingerprint: 093C BB84 17F6 3AA6 6D5E  FC4F 84E1 FED1 E426 64D1


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20051103/09bf9ef0/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list