lm_sensors in FC4-updates for x86_64 twice?

[seth vidal]

On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 22:53 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > no, I don't want to hear any bitching and moaning about this, that's how
> > it is.
> 
> At some point we should change this to only pull in as few packages as
> really needed, but that also comes with quite some calculation cost.

why isn't the way it's currently being done correct? We've gone round
and round on this and its always come down to how to handle globs of
commands.

> This should really be something where yum, up2date and smart algorithms
> should work together and then implement the best solution available.

is up2date much of a concern anymore?

-sv