status of up2date and rhn-applet

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Nov 29 08:01:20 UTC 2005


On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> > 
> > > It would be very nice if one of the update utilities could be set to
> > > ignore updates across repositories. I.e. if I've installed foo from
> > > core and bar from atrpms and atrpms has newer versions of both foo and
> > > bar, only bar gets updated.
> > 
> > smart can do exactly that.
> 
> You can use the sha/md5sum digest info to match between the rpms
> installed in rpmdb (/var/lib/rpm/) and the rpm packages from the
> repositories. This will only work if the repos still have the older
> rpms listed though.

Most repos purge the old rpms, and even updates-released does so every
now and then.

Why not use the signature or other meta- data like vendor to map
packages to origin?

> Is smart storing addon information in its own database?

No, no history information.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20051129/d367b584/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list