[RETRY #2] Web100 kernel patch on fedora stock kernels

Dimi Paun dimi at lattica.com
Wed Oct 12 23:53:09 UTC 2005


From: "Dave Jones" <davej at redhat.com>
> My http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/*/ pages have a list
> of patches in each kernel, though they are somewhat out of date now.

Looking at:

http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC4/kernel-2.6.13-1.1529_FC4.src.rpm-buildlog.txt

I see this:
+ echo 'Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):'
+ echo 'Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):'
/usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:6:2: warning: #warning using private kernel
header; include <endian.h> instead!
/usr/lib/bison.simple:164:5: warning: "YYMAXDEPTH" is not defined
Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):
Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):
Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):
Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):

Does this mean that 2.6.13-1.1529 in FC4 has only 4 patches on top of
the upstream kernel?

> At some point the patches in CVS will all be documented, and
> I can run some script nightly that auto-generates those text files.

That would be very cool indeed, I was just trying to convince a
friend that FC4 kernels are rather standard. It would have come
in handy :)

-- 
Dimi Paun <dimi at lattica.com>
Lattica, Inc.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list