SquashFS?

[Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:21:39PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:23 +0100, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:03:16PM +0200, Darko Ilic wrote:
> > > Well, having unionfs included in the kernel would be *great* for live CDs. 
> > > 
> > > If we could push both unionfs and SquashFS to go upstream, that would improve 
> > > the quality of live CDs dramatically. 
> > 
> > To have unionfs and squashfs upstream would be nice, yes. But they can
> > be used regardless of being upstream or not.
> 
> Not for an official Fedora Live CD.  One aspect is that it *must* be
> built using components distributed as part of Fedora and we're
> (generally speaking) against patches which aren't upstream because they
> significantly raise the maintenance burden and then also get people
> complaining because the kernel isn't "stock"
> 
> Jeremy

I now realize you're speaking about a live cd created by the fedora
project, not about a package for creation of livecds.

Sorry for the noise, my bad.

Regards,
Luciano Rocha

-- 
lfr
0/0