Unofficial FC4.1 i386 isos

Sat Sep 17 05:54:57 UTC 2005

On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 11:49 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
> On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:33, Warren Togami wrote:
> > http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/1398/
> > As for the kernel I personally think 1398 is far less problematic for
> > most folks than 1447.  I copied all of the 1398 kernels for you here
> > if you want to try that instead.  Or maybe you should wait for a
> > better new FC4 update kernel to hit the official tree.
> 
> If it's that bad, why didn't we rollback to 1398 after the discovery of 
> badness?

It's not bad for me :)