multilib paths and packaging for processor-specific extensions

[Arjan van de Ven]

> My second question is what are people's opinions about including all 
> architecture-specific libraries in a single i386 package vs. separating 
> them into subpackages. A base set of atlas libraries is a 5 MB package 
> (and bigger installed of course), part of the reason I think that the 
> Debian packages for atlas are all separated into subpackages (atlas-sse, 
> etc).

I would go for 1 big package. Reason: it's really unfunny to otherwise
make sure the right package gets installed automatically (other than
installing the lot anyway, at which point you might as well make one big
one)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050919/d839c723/attachment.sig>