Unofficial FC4.1 i386 isos
Jeff Pitman
symbiont at berlios.de
Sat Sep 17 03:49:27 UTC 2005
On Saturday 17 September 2005 05:33, Warren Togami wrote:
> http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/1398/
> As for the kernel I personally think 1398 is far less problematic for
> most folks than 1447. I copied all of the 1398 kernels for you here
> if you want to try that instead. Or maybe you should wait for a
> better new FC4 update kernel to hit the official tree.
If it's that bad, why didn't we rollback to 1398 after the discovery of
badness?
--
-jeff
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list