giflib for fc5

[Warren Togami]

Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 19:11 +0200, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
> 
>>Providing a real library (which can be empty and just require
>>libgif.so.4) also solves the provides: (64bit) problems.
> 
> 
> This feels a bit cleaner to me and thus would get my vote
> 

How about we keep the versioned libungif symlink for runtime compat, but 
remove libungif.so and libungif-devel provides so packages must build 
against giflib-devel explicitly?

This would still require the if conditional for the libungif Provides, 
but otherwise is correct.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com