hesiod lib problem

[Clyde E. Kunkel]

Erwin Rol wrote:
> I don't know how, but the problem is back again today;
> 
>   Updating  : libgnome                     ##################### [
> 1/295]
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
> 
> 
> - Erwin
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:15 -0400, Richard Hally wrote:
>> for several days, ldconfig has been throwing the following errors:
>>
>>
>>    Updating  : subversion                   ##################### [ 19/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>>    Updating  : libstdc++-devel              ##################### [ 20/106]
>>    Updating  : libgnat                      ##################### [ 21/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>>    Updating  : libobjc                      ##################### [ 22/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>>    Updating  : xorg-x11-server-Xorg         ##################### [ 23/106]
>>    Updating  : metacity                     ##################### [ 24/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>>    Updating  : libgomp                      ##################### [ 25/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>>    Updating  : cpp                          ##################### [ 26/106]
>>    Updating  : gcc                          ##################### [ 27/106]
>>    Updating  : libgfortran                  ##################### [ 28/106]
>> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>>
>> The pertinent part of /usr/lib looks like this:
>>
>> [root at LinuxNew2 lib]# ll libhe*
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16846 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.a
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    18 Mar 31 10:03 libhesiod.so -> libhesiod.so.0.0.0
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42747 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40863 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0.0.0
>> [root at LinuxNew2 lib]#
>>
>> How should this be fixed?
>>
> 

I am seeing this also and don't see a bz on it.  Should there be a bz?

-- 
Regards,

Old Fart
(my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)