Why Elektra is the wrong approach (Was Re: The Strengths and Weakness of Fedora/RHEL OS management)

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 12:25 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 18:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> > Would it have been so hard to include a server component from the start
> > when people gave you early warnings instead of bolting it in as an
> > afterthought ?
> 
> Uhm, no one is forcing you to use NetworkManager just yet so there is
> not really any regression.

Which is why people complaining so far are few.

>  Btw, the price we pay to support two
> networking configuration stacks is higher than you think.

Probably.
But no one advocated two config stacks - just one that took care of the
whole problem-space (which includes the no-gui-nor-user-logged-in,
many-users-logged-in, gui-user, tui-over-ssh-user)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 199 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060404/70c46f91/attachment.sig>