Fedora Bounties (seeking ideas)

[Patrick W. Barnes]

On Monday 17 April 2006 03:39, "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Patrick W. Barnes <nman64 at n-man.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 17 April 2006 03:09, "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > > What became of the Backup tool from last year's SOC?
> >
> > https://sucs.org/~davea/trac/
> >
> > The developer disappeared.
>
> Does that mean I can apply to do this? I am a freshman (I found out
> about SOC-2005 when it was too late) and I think Fedora is desperately
> in need of a backup/restoration tool, esp. since fresh installs are
> so..fresh.
>
> Also it is a lot harder for me to dissappear. www.pembo13.com
>

I don't see any reason why not.  It does qualify according to the SoC rules, 
and it is something that we need.  It might help to coordinate with the rest 
of our community a little better than the previous developer to get the 
support and feedback that this sort of project really needs.

If you do apply for this project, please make sure you reference the previous 
work and give a solid summary of what you plan to accomplish and how.

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com

http://www.n-man.com/

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060417/49943a84/attachment.sig>