Collecting and fixing pet peeve bugs
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Fri Aug 4 17:28:04 UTC 2006
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:31:53PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make sure that
> >> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug?
> >> Just remove abusing bugs?
> > Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend
> > someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed.
> I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with
> the use of keywords)
I'm not sure a blocker bug is really appropriate, as by definition it's
unlikely all the dependencies will ever be resolved.
Keywords are really trivial.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list