Dependencies a little excessive?

seth vidal skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Fri Aug 11 03:27:40 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:34:38PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Why should xfsprogs install i386 packages when vim doesn't?
> > b/c, afaik, there is no i386 package for vim in the x86_64 tree.
> 
> Yeah, I think that's his point -- from a user point of view, it's
> unpredictable behavior.

is it?

yum will install all archs that it CAN

seems predictable to me.

-sv





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list