[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Collecting and fixing pet peeve bugs




Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Or a bugzilla keyword.
>> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make sure that
>> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug?
>> Just remove abusing bugs?
> 
> Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend
> someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed.
> 
I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with
the use of keywords)

> Perhaps have a way to *nominate* a bug for addition, and only add one after
> a certain amount of interest?
> 
Hmm, I think we should first come up with a tracking mechanism for bugs
like this, see how it works and only create procedures surrounding this
tracking mechanism if they are needed.

Regards,

Hans


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]