launchd

[Bill Nottingham]

Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) said: 
> Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > It's APSL 2.0, not Apache. Unless they've changed it. And that therein is
> > the problem (well, one of them.)
> 
> They changed the license from APSL 2.0 to Apache 2.0 a few hours ago:
> http://lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-dev/2006/Aug/msg00067.html
> http://launchd.macosforge.org/
> 
> Now of course, if what's required is GPL compatibility (which is what the wiki 
> says), this won't change much.

The problem with the APSL isn't GPL compatiblity as much (although
that didn't help); it's the patent clause. Apache is better
in that regard.

Bill