[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: launchd



tir, 08 08 2006 kl. 10:53 -0400, skrev Bill Nottingham:
> David Nielsen (david lovesunix net) said: 
> > > The problem with the APSL isn't GPL compatiblity as much (although
> > > that didn't help); it's the patent clause. Apache is better
> > > in that regard.
> > 
> > I'm a bit confused, does better indicate that we might be legally
> > allowed to use it in Fedora now or does it still make RMS cry?
> 
> Apache license is legally feasible. Haven't actually looked at any
> of the code.

Thank you, that was basically the answer I was looking for, since
nothing legal is stopping us it wouldn't be a waste of time to read the
code.

- David


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]