Feedback on Java applet functionality?

[Hans de Goede]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>  > On Friday 11 August 2006 16:29, Andrew Haley wrote:
>  > > No.  It requires execmem because it really needs it.
>  > 
>  > Then it really needs to be fixed.
> 
> It doesn't need to be fixed becasue it's not a bug.  We generate code
> on the fly because it's the right thing to do.  There's nothing
> special about gcj in this regard: generating code on the fly is not
> unusual, and it's a valid techinique.
> 

Yes and there are ways to make it work without tripping over selinux's
execmem check, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185214#c4

Regards,

Hans