evolution crashes

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Mon Aug 14 13:29:38 UTC 2006



Erwin Rol schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Jesse Keating schrieb:
>>> On Monday 14 August 2006 08:01, Erwin Rol wrote:
>>>> Wow you had a serious bad weekend , didn't you ?
>>> The CAPS is a direct quote from the mailman page.  Thorsten was 
>>> helpfully select/inserting the content from the mailman page into the 
>>> email.  The caps aren't his.
>> thx Jesse for this clarification. Yes, that was quoted from the list 
>> info page.
> Than sorry for the remark, no offense meant.

np

>> But it seems the people don't get the differences between fedora-devel 
>> and fedora-test list. Mostly not their fault AFAICS. We IMHO need to 
>> make the differences more clear. I'd vote for a special 
>> fedora-development-tree-list to make it more obvious, but I know 
>> people won't like yet another mailinglist (fedora-test-list could stay 
>> and handle updates-testing stuff for stable releases). fedora-devel 
>> should IMHO stay only for general discussions ("Xorg 7.1 as FC5 
>> update" and stuff like that).
> Test and development have kind of blurry edges, maybe my first mail 
> should have gone to the test-list,

Probably.

> but where should the question go on 
> why GDB and evolution do not play nice ? And what if i not only test, 
> but also debug (which i was trying to do) ?

Probably fedora-test, too.

>> Further: The rawhide reports IMHO shouldn't be sendto both 
>> fedora-devel and fedora-test-list because sometimes stuff get 
>> discussed in reply to one list while the same or other stuff gets 
>> discussed on the other. That's confusing. At least a common "Reply-to" 
>> would be helpful so all replies go to one list by default (people can 
>> override it if there is a need to).
> Ones again , Thorsten, no offense meant to you personally.

np, I have asbestos underwear ;-)

CU
thl




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list