evolution crashes
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Mon Aug 14 13:29:38 UTC 2006
Erwin Rol schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Jesse Keating schrieb:
>>> On Monday 14 August 2006 08:01, Erwin Rol wrote:
>>>> Wow you had a serious bad weekend , didn't you ?
>>> The CAPS is a direct quote from the mailman page. Thorsten was
>>> helpfully select/inserting the content from the mailman page into the
>>> email. The caps aren't his.
>> thx Jesse for this clarification. Yes, that was quoted from the list
>> info page.
> Than sorry for the remark, no offense meant.
np
>> But it seems the people don't get the differences between fedora-devel
>> and fedora-test list. Mostly not their fault AFAICS. We IMHO need to
>> make the differences more clear. I'd vote for a special
>> fedora-development-tree-list to make it more obvious, but I know
>> people won't like yet another mailinglist (fedora-test-list could stay
>> and handle updates-testing stuff for stable releases). fedora-devel
>> should IMHO stay only for general discussions ("Xorg 7.1 as FC5
>> update" and stuff like that).
> Test and development have kind of blurry edges, maybe my first mail
> should have gone to the test-list,
Probably.
> but where should the question go on
> why GDB and evolution do not play nice ? And what if i not only test,
> but also debug (which i was trying to do) ?
Probably fedora-test, too.
>> Further: The rawhide reports IMHO shouldn't be sendto both
>> fedora-devel and fedora-test-list because sometimes stuff get
>> discussed in reply to one list while the same or other stuff gets
>> discussed on the other. That's confusing. At least a common "Reply-to"
>> would be helpful so all replies go to one list by default (people can
>> override it if there is a need to).
> Ones again , Thorsten, no offense meant to you personally.
np, I have asbestos underwear ;-)
CU
thl
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list