[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: evolution crashes

Erwin Rol schrieb:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Jesse Keating schrieb:
On Monday 14 August 2006 08:01, Erwin Rol wrote:
Wow you had a serious bad weekend , didn't you ?
The CAPS is a direct quote from the mailman page. Thorsten was helpfully select/inserting the content from the mailman page into the email. The caps aren't his.
thx Jesse for this clarification. Yes, that was quoted from the list info page.
Than sorry for the remark, no offense meant.


But it seems the people don't get the differences between fedora-devel and fedora-test list. Mostly not their fault AFAICS. We IMHO need to make the differences more clear. I'd vote for a special fedora-development-tree-list to make it more obvious, but I know people won't like yet another mailinglist (fedora-test-list could stay and handle updates-testing stuff for stable releases). fedora-devel should IMHO stay only for general discussions ("Xorg 7.1 as FC5 update" and stuff like that).
Test and development have kind of blurry edges, maybe my first mail should have gone to the test-list,


but where should the question go on why GDB and evolution do not play nice ? And what if i not only test, but also debug (which i was trying to do) ?

Probably fedora-test, too.

Further: The rawhide reports IMHO shouldn't be sendto both fedora-devel and fedora-test-list because sometimes stuff get discussed in reply to one list while the same or other stuff gets discussed on the other. That's confusing. At least a common "Reply-to" would be helpful so all replies go to one list by default (people can override it if there is a need to).
Ones again , Thorsten, no offense meant to you personally.

np, I have asbestos underwear ;-)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]