[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:06:43PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Leszek Matok schrieb:
> >Dnia 15-08-2006, wto o godzinie 09:27 -0400, Jesse Keating napisaƂ(a):
> >>(...) all kinds of weird hacks to how they are (...)
> >>Arguing over which ugly ass hack to apply to be able to package kernel 
> >>modules is a bikeshed argument.
> >[...]
> >So, kmdls are the next step.
> Kernel-Module packaging is already working, defined, agreed on by FESCo 
> and used in Fedora Extras. See
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/kmod-em8300-0.15.3-
> for example. The same scheme is used in lvn -- nobody reported problems 
> with it there.

I'm reproting problems and I wrote a ton of information about the
problems. Don't I count?

> But Axel thinks the scheme FESCo invented (in round about half a year of 
> work) is broken and he thinks his scheme is better.

Is that wrong to think? And I'm trying to get better tools in the
hands of Fedora developers. Is that wrong, too?
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpCXRd5JtwIF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]