Maintainance of hwdata
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Tue Dec 5 17:59:21 UTC 2006
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:52:59AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:24 +0100, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > Till Maas schrieb:
> > > Hiyas,
> > >
> > > new bugs about hwdata are assigned to Karsten Hopp in bugzilla, but according
> > > to the changelog of hwdata he never made any change to it, ever. So is this
> > > normal for fedora core packages? Or is there maybe some false information
> > > about the maintainer of hwdata in Bugzilla because the open bugs seem to get
> > > not much attention.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Till
> > >
> >
> > No, the bugzilla information is correct. I just recently got this package from
> > Phil, that's why you won't find any changelogs from me yet.
>
> one thing that would be nice is if the cpu microcode data would actually
> move from microcode_ctl to hwdata; the program almost never gets updated
> but the microcode file gets updated every few months
hwdata is noarch though. Including x86 microcode data on all arches would be
a bit crap.
Dave
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list