ideal config management framework [was: CPU Frequency Scaling]

[Thomas M Steenholdt]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> Theoretically, I think gconf could actually support this if someone were
> interested in writing the backend.
> 

Of course that would still require a policy daemon to be running, which 
is one of the aspects I particularly do not like about the global 
registry based approach.

However - A framework that looks and works similar to gconf could be 
written based on this idea. Perhaps this was what you meant? The 
difference would be that such a framework would not require a policy 
daemon to be running.

/Thomas