rawhide report: 20060202 changes

[Jeremy Katz]

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:36 +0900, Jens Petersen wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:46:52 -0500
> Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the
> > logic behind this?
> 
> Right various languages should probably be added to comps: this will
> certainly happen for Indian scripts at least which I'm currently
> working on.

If it's required by other packages, it should just be required by those
packages instead of requiring an explicit selection.

> On the other hand of course not every language needs to be comps either:
> I don't think most Swedes say need to have m17n-db-swedish installed
> for example.

If it doesn't need to be in comps, then why does it need to be
shipped?  

Jeremy