Bugzilla prioritised improvements list

[Thomas M Steenholdt]

Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:22:53 +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:
> 
>> Not sure where put put it, but i find that one of the reasons bz is
>> hard to find duplicates in, are because the "devel" version under
>> "fedora core" product, for example, is not about bugs in current
>> rawhide, as expected, but has bugs that dates back to the "old days"
> 
> I'm sorry? I was under the impression that FC->Devel was the category
> tracking, well FC devel, which is what rawhide was some years ago.
> 

FC devel is still referred to as rawhide on many occations - but since 
test X releases are effectively snapshots of rawhide at a somewhat 
stable point in time, picking the right distribution for querying for 
already reported bugs becomes just a little less straight forward... All 
reports filed under FC devel are still there - even bugs reported 
against Pre FC 1 test releases... Again - recently released test X 
releases (pre FC5 for example) could just as well have had bugs 
repported against rawhide, since we're updating from the devel tree 
anyways, during the testing.

I'm merely suggesting that something could be done to make this a little 
clearer. I'll probably survive myself, but I have had the doubtful honor 
of filing a duplicate BZ or two (because i was not able to find the 
existing BZs, perhaps because of this).

/Thomas