Xen issues - Was Xen network performance problem during kickstart.
Stephen C. Tweedie
sct at redhat.com
Mon Feb 20 17:17:14 UTC 2006
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 01:11 +0900, Naoki wrote:
> Cheers, just tried as of a few minutes ago and it's still with me..
>
> kernel BUG at include/asm/xor.h:633!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in: xor raid1 raid0 xennet sr_mod sd_mod scsi_mod cdrom
> squashfs loop nfs nfs_acl lockd sunrpc vfat fat cramfs
> CPU: 0
Working fine for me. Are you using 32- or 64-bit here? It may be that
the 32-bit install is still broken, but 64-bit certainly doesn't show it
for me.
> > > 2) Ridiculously slow : 4 hours for a guest install of ‾500mb. No
> > > identifiable host problem. I'm trying to do a network install and the
> > > instance running right now is doing less than 1 byte/sec according to
> > > "xm top".
>
> Just had it complete an install in an hour. Which is better. Ran some
> tests.
I just did a graphical NFS domU install in about 20 minutes.
That was with a 400MB guest, though --- install really likes a lot of
memory, and you can often shrink the guest significantly after the
install. Was your guest memory-constrained?
> 932.47 KB/s
Even 1MB/sec should be plenty fast enough for an NFS install. But my
domU is showing >8MB/sec from a remote NFS mount; I've no idea why you
are seeing such a difference between domU and dom0. Is this an
otherwise-idle machine?
--Stephen
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list