FC5 and Yum Plugins
fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Jan 1 12:24:47 UTC 2006
Am Sonntag, den 01.01.2006, 00:41 -0800 schrieb Michael A. Peters:
> On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 19:31 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:17:02PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:49 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > > Er, or just volunteer to package mythtv for livna?
> > That is the second time this suggestion comes up in this thread. What
> > makes livna and ATrpms different, or say livna preferable to ATrpms in
> > this context? At the beginning of this thread some people posted about
> > livna replacing packages just as well.
> > Just for the note: Fedora itself, when it wasn't merged with RHL (aka
> > fedora.us) decided to have vendor packages replaced. packages like
> > shadow-utils or rpm itself.
I can't remember exactly, but wasn't that in a separate sub-repo and/or
for a distribution that was not maintained anymore by Red Hat?
> To be honest - I don't think in general that livna should replace extras
I agree -- IMHO audacity in livna should be renamed to audacity-mp3 (or
something else, no better idea atm) and conflict with audacity from
extras. That way people can uninstall audacity from extras and manually
install the version from livna if they want to (maybe it also works with
some obsolete-magic, but I don't think so and did not try).
Michael, could you file a bug in livna's bugzilla? tia
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
More information about the fedora-devel-list