FC5 and Yum Plugins

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Tue Jan 3 00:56:11 UTC 2006

On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:34 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Oh yes, it did:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-January/msg01826.html
> Maybe it doesn't anymore, but for good manners everytime a yum release
> comes up and mentiones bugs fixed I run and distribute it to ATrpms
> folks and they are *happy* about it. Especially the ones running FC
> older then the latest, that doesn't get any yum problems fixed
> anymore.

Wouldn't the right thing to do be to push to get stuff like this fixed
in Fedora, rather than happily replacing a core package with your own at
the slightest provocation? (And to Fedora developers, you should also be
receptive to accepting bug fixes like this in a timely manner...)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060102/10483566/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list