Double occurrence of "libevent" RPMS in core and extras

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:44 -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> It should also be part of policy to make sure that if Extras 
> packages are adopted into Core, that they upgrade existing FE 
> packages. In other words, up that Release if you're going to 
> rebuild, don't just rebuild.
> 
> This process should really just be one of courtesy and sanity. We 
> are happy to work with Red Hat employees, but it really looks bad 
> when Red Hat doesn't want to work with us.

I agree completely.  We have internal policies that come into play with
packages are added to a product, such as Core.  I can easily make part
of that process involve touching base w/ the Extras maintainer and
making sure the Core package supersedes the existing extras nvre when
moving a package from Extras to core.

Externally, I imagine a few things have to happen within Extras,
removing the package and whatnot.  Whats the best way to coordinate
this?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060118/127d2823/attachment.sig>