rawhide report: 20060121 changes

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Tue Jan 24 01:33:31 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 11:56 +1030, n0dalus wrote:
> I think I would prefer the latter. 

While I don't discount your opinion, this has been discussed ad naseum.
The end result of this discussion is that yum will not change the way it
deals with broken deps.  However this does not stop somebody from
developing a yum plugin that will work around this and ask the user if
they wish to install anyway, working around the package tree(s) that are
broken.  That is something that could go into Fedora Extras.

Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060123/55279b52/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list